SELECT * FROM onek WHERE onek.unique1 < 10 ORDER BY onek.unique1; SELECT onek.unique1, onek.stringu1 FROM onek WHERE onek.unique1 < 20 ORDER BY unique1 using >; SELECT onek.unique1, onek.stringu1 FROM onek WHERE onek.unique1 > 980 ORDER BY stringu1 using <; SELECT onek.unique1, onek.string4 FROM onek WHERE onek.unique1 > 980 ORDER BY string4 using <, unique1 using >; SELECT onek.unique1, onek.string4 FROM onek WHERE onek.unique1 > 980 ORDER BY string4 using >, unique1 using <; -- -- awk '{if($1<20){print $1,$16;}else{next;}}' onek.data | -- sort +0nr -1 +1d -2 -- SELECT onek.unique1, onek.string4 FROM onek WHERE onek.unique1 < 20 ORDER BY unique1 using >, string4 using <; -- -- awk '{if($1<20){print $1,$16;}else{next;}}' onek.data | -- sort +0n -1 +1dr -2 -- SELECT onek.unique1, onek.string4 FROM onek WHERE onek.unique1 < 20 ORDER BY unique1 using <, string4 using >; -- -- test partial btree indexes -- -- As of 7.2, planner probably won't pick an indexscan without stats, -- so ANALYZE first. Also, we want to prevent it from picking a bitmapscan -- followed by sort, because that could hide index ordering problems. -- ANALYZE onek2; SET enable_seqscan TO off; SET enable_bitmapscan TO off; SET enable_sort TO off; -- -- awk '{if($1<10){print $0;}else{next;}}' onek.data | sort +0n -1 -- SELECT onek2.* FROM onek2 WHERE onek2.unique1 < 10; -- -- awk '{if($1<20){print $1,$14;}else{next;}}' onek.data | sort +0nr -1 -- SELECT onek2.unique1, onek2.stringu1 FROM onek2 WHERE onek2.unique1 < 20 ORDER BY unique1 using >; -- -- awk '{if($1>980){print $1,$14;}else{next;}}' onek.data | sort +1d -2 -- SELECT onek2.unique1, onek2.stringu1 FROM onek2 WHERE onek2.unique1 > 980; RESET enable_seqscan; RESET enable_bitmapscan; RESET enable_sort; SELECT two, stringu1, ten, string4 INTO TABLE tmp FROM onek; -- -- awk '{print $1,$2;}' person.data | -- awk '{if(NF!=2){print $3,$2;}else{print;}}' - emp.data | -- awk '{if(NF!=2){print $3,$2;}else{print;}}' - student.data | -- awk 'BEGIN{FS=" ";}{if(NF!=2){print $4,$5;}else{print;}}' - stud_emp.data -- -- SELECT name, age FROM person*; ??? check if different SELECT p.name, p.age FROM person* p; -- -- awk '{print $1,$2;}' person.data | -- awk '{if(NF!=2){print $3,$2;}else{print;}}' - emp.data | -- awk '{if(NF!=2){print $3,$2;}else{print;}}' - student.data | -- awk 'BEGIN{FS=" ";}{if(NF!=1){print $4,$5;}else{print;}}' - stud_emp.data | -- sort +1nr -2 -- SELECT p.name, p.age FROM person* p ORDER BY age using >, name; -- -- Test some cases involving whole-row Var referencing a subquery -- select foo from (select 1 offset 0) as foo; select foo from (select null offset 0) as foo; select foo from (select 'xyzzy',1,null offset 0) as foo; -- -- Test VALUES lists -- select * from onek, (values(147, 'RFAAAA'), (931, 'VJAAAA')) as v (i, j) WHERE onek.unique1 = v.i and onek.stringu1 = v.j; -- a more complex case -- looks like we're coding lisp :-) select * from onek, (values ((select i from (values(10000), (2), (389), (1000), (2000), ((select 10029))) as foo(i) order by i asc limit 1))) bar (i) where onek.unique1 = bar.i; -- try VALUES in a subquery select * from onek where (unique1,ten) in (values (1,1), (20,0), (99,9), (17,99)) order by unique1; -- VALUES is also legal as a standalone query or a set-operation member VALUES (1,2), (3,4+4), (7,77.7); VALUES (1,2), (3,4+4), (7,77.7) UNION ALL SELECT 2+2, 57 UNION ALL TABLE int8_tbl; -- -- Test ORDER BY options -- CREATE TEMP TABLE foo (f1 int); INSERT INTO foo VALUES (42),(3),(10),(7),(null),(null),(1); SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1; SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1 ASC; -- same thing SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1 NULLS FIRST; SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1 DESC; SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1 DESC NULLS LAST; -- check if indexscans do the right things CREATE INDEX fooi ON foo (f1); SET enable_sort = false; SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1; SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1 NULLS FIRST; SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1 DESC; SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1 DESC NULLS LAST; DROP INDEX fooi; CREATE INDEX fooi ON foo (f1 DESC); SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1; SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1 NULLS FIRST; SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1 DESC; SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1 DESC NULLS LAST; DROP INDEX fooi; CREATE INDEX fooi ON foo (f1 DESC NULLS LAST); SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1; SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1 NULLS FIRST; SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1 DESC; SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY f1 DESC NULLS LAST; -- -- Test planning of some cases with partial indexes -- -- partial index is usable explain (costs off) select * from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 = 'ATAAAA'; select * from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 = 'ATAAAA'; -- actually run the query with an analyze to use the partial index explain (costs off, analyze on, timing off, summary off) select * from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 = 'ATAAAA'; explain (costs off) select unique2 from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 = 'ATAAAA'; select unique2 from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 = 'ATAAAA'; -- partial index predicate implies clause, so no need for retest explain (costs off) select * from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 < 'B'; select * from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 < 'B'; explain (costs off) select unique2 from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 < 'B'; select unique2 from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 < 'B'; -- but if it's an update target, must retest anyway explain (costs off) select unique2 from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 < 'B' for update; select unique2 from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 < 'B' for update; -- partial index is not applicable explain (costs off) select unique2 from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 < 'C'; select unique2 from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 < 'C'; -- partial index implies clause, but bitmap scan must recheck predicate anyway SET enable_indexscan TO off; explain (costs off) select unique2 from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 < 'B'; select unique2 from onek2 where unique2 = 11 and stringu1 < 'B'; RESET enable_indexscan; -- check multi-index cases too explain (costs off) select unique1, unique2 from onek2 where (unique2 = 11 or unique1 = 0) and stringu1 < 'B'; select unique1, unique2 from onek2 where (unique2 = 11 or unique1 = 0) and stringu1 < 'B'; explain (costs off) select unique1, unique2 from onek2 where (unique2 = 11 and stringu1 < 'B') or unique1 = 0; select unique1, unique2 from onek2 where (unique2 = 11 and stringu1 < 'B') or unique1 = 0; -- -- Test some corner cases that have been known to confuse the planner -- -- ORDER BY on a constant doesn't really need any sorting SELECT 1 AS x ORDER BY x; -- But ORDER BY on a set-valued expression does create function sillysrf(int) returns setof int as 'values (1),(10),(2),($1)' language sql immutable; select sillysrf(42); select sillysrf(-1) order by 1; drop function sillysrf(int); -- X = X isn't a no-op, it's effectively X IS NOT NULL assuming = is strict -- (see bug #5084) select * from (values (2),(null),(1)) v(k) where k = k order by k; select * from (values (2),(null),(1)) v(k) where k = k; -- Test partitioned tables with no partitions, which should be handled the -- same as the non-inheritance case when expanding its RTE. create table list_parted_tbl (a int,b int) partition by list (a); create table list_parted_tbl1 partition of list_parted_tbl for values in (1) partition by list(b); explain (costs off) select * from list_parted_tbl; drop table list_parted_tbl;